As Google has looked to increase revenues and move beyond being “just a search engine” they have put themselves at the top of the food chain in multiple categories. Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely, etc. 😉
If you search for books their book search, is the result in natural search and when you search for movies they push their iGoogle application in paid search. Every holiday season Google, tries to make further inroads in e-commerce by doing things like offering free Checkout services (at launch of Google Checkout).
Integrating Google Checkout with AdWords ads (and claiming this increases ad CTR by ~ 10%), and promoting Google Base / Google Product Search more aggressively in their navigation and organic search results. Some early Google Checkout users also got free links.
As Google dives into music services, a new one-box with links to selected partners will appear at the top of the search results. And as Google makes tie-ins, with more software providers you can look for Google to promote Google pack and other such offerings across the spectrum of search results.
Google has tested creating a mortgage marketplace, in the UK and LendingTree, is then suing a business partner because they heard that the company might sell data to Google. Everything is a beta and everything is a test. And then one day a new competitor appears from nowhere.
At times Google seems unbelievably savvy, but at times they seem unbelievably conflicted. Google claims that searchers, are expecting more for advertisers and that advertisers need to start acting more like magazine publishers. who publish (and advertise) great featured content. Sounds good, maybe.
But then Google launches an AdWords ad translation kit. It is pretty safe to say that if a machine translates, your ads in a competitive marketplace you are wasting an awful lot of profit margin. Google claims to like brands, that brands are how you sort out the cesspool, and to show brands for generic keywords to increase user satisfaction.
But let’s look at a recent search result for the eBay brand. Google knows that eBay.com gets a 90%+++ CTR, that the keyword is a trademark, that the keyword is navigational, etc etc etc. And in spite of eBay even bidding on their own brand, this is perhaps the first time Google takes a valuable partner hostage.
If Google claims that they need to show brands on generic search queries, to increase user satisfaction then why do they pollute the associated brand search results with irrelevant nonsense?. Navigational searches are the easiest ones in the world to get right, and if a site has historically got a 90%+++ click-through rate for a keyword, why would it ever make sense to risk putting a universal search result or a marginally relevant ad above the obvious #1 result?
If people are looking specifically for news when entering a branded 1 word trademarked keyword then surely they would skip past the #1 result for the official site. Sure there is money in promoting apps for eBay, but it seems so counter to Google’s messaging when justifying their algorithmic editorial philosophy elsewhere.
Sourced from SEO Book
Get in touch
Want to know more about google through SEO. why don’t you contact GrowTraffic to find out more?
alternatively you can contact our facebook page.